Individual Marylanders freed, or manumitted, thousands of enslaved African Americans by individual voluntary acts recorded in deeds or wills. Here, Maryland’s path again diverged from that of neighboring states. The northern states ended slavery through legislative or judicial acts, typically through the delayed emancipation of all enslaved children born after a fixed date.
Because Maryland did not abolish slavery as its neighbors to the north did, or limit the practice of private manumission as its neighbors to the South did, it had a high rate of manumissions. Maryland masters often freed their enslaved African Americans, not one or two, but most, or all of them together. Balancing economic necessity with religious and moral reasons, owners who manumitted their enslaved persons often did so by term, meaning they were to be freed at a future specified date. These were called “delayed manumissions.” It has been estimated that just over half of all manumissions registered in Maryland prior to 1832 were of this type.
Prospective manumitters also freed their enslaved individuals by wills once the state lifted its prohibition against the practice in 1790. This method not only allowed masters their full services during the master’s lifetime but also often provided a term of service for the owner’s beneficiaries.
The will of Margaret Carroll, the Barrister’s widow is a perfect example of this trend as its terms stated that: |
